|
Various Perspectives
on Violence
Martin L. Korn, MD
A forum [1] presented at the 153rd annual meeting
of the American Psychiatric Association (APA) described the
work of the APA Task Force on Violence. The task force has
been empowered to develop guidelines for the recognition and
treatment of aggression. Increasing physician safety is an
important component of the committee's mission. A monograph
[2] based on the work of the task force is scheduled
for publication in 2000. Carl C. Bell, MD, chair of the meeting
and editor of the monograph, has also been working with the
federal government to develop antiviolence initiatives.
At least 69% of the US population experience a violent traumatic
event in the course of their lifetime. Approximately 20% to
25% of these individuals will go on to experience posttraumatic
stress disorder (PTSD). Earlier experiences of trauma increase
the likelihood of later development of PTSD. The reaction
to trauma also tends to be persistent. Ninety-four percent
of rape victims show acute stress disorder within a week after
a rape. Nine months later, 47% still have symptoms.
Clinician-Directed Violence
Joe P. Tupin, MD,[1] talked about the
risk of violence to the clinician. Forty percent of psychiatrists
have been assaulted sometime during their career. The occupational
risk of violence in psychiatry is high compared with other
vocations. Only taxicab drivers, convenience store clerks,
and policemen suffer from more violent episodes.
The immediacy of the risk to the clinician was divided into
3 levels based on the time dimension. Emergent indicated
immediate serious threat to the clinician, and the use of
seclusion, restraints, and medications is indicated. Urgent
referred to escalating patients who may lose control in the
near future. Verbal discussion, oral medications, or seclusion
may help to de-escalate the situation. The third category
is the potentially violent, and a thorough evaluation
of risk factors should be made to fully assess the extent
of dangerousness.
Arthur Z. Berg, MD,[1] emphasized the role of
the clinician and institutional denial in the improper evaluation
of the aggressive patient. John R. Lion, MD,[1] reported on 17 physicians who were killed by patients. Half of these were
psychiatrists. In some of these cases, a more direct confrontation
of the clinical situation by the clinician might have been
helpful in reversing the fatal outcomes. There are many warning
signs that a patient was "about to blow." These
include pacing, clenching of fists, darting eyes, intrusion
into others' personal space, and unexplained feelings of discomfort
on the part of the clinician.
Biological Factors Related to Aggression
There are clear genetic contributions to impulsivity and
aggression, although the exact details remain to be elucidated.
Abnormalities in neurotransmitters, including decreased serotonergic
function as well as increased noradrenergic function, have
been related to aggressive behavior. Brain injury results
in increased rates of aggression and may be alleviated by
anticonvulsants such as carbamazepine as well as valproate.
These may have a clinical effect even in the absence of seizures.
Amphetamines and cocaine may lead to increased violence, as
does phencyclidine ("angel dust"). Acute alcohol
intoxication results in behavioral disinhibition and is frequently
related to high levels of aggression.
Family Violence
Sandra J. Kaplan, MD,[1] divided family violence
into child physical and sexual abuse, domestic violence (also
called intimate or partner abuse), and elder abuse. Each of
these categories is classified based on the target of the
violent act. Family violence is a major public health problem,
with approximately 1500 children dying each year in the United
States. Domestic violence accounts for a large proportion
of traumatic injury to women.
Appropriate clinical evaluation and intervention should be
conducted in the context of existing professional standards
and guidelines. Family violence, for example, always requires
a physical examination of alleged wounds or injury. Interviews
without the alleged perpetrator present should be conducted
to obtain adequate disclosure of information. Conflict resolution strategies should be practiced in many of
these clinical situations.
The risk factors for each type of family violence should
be known. Risk factors for child abuse include exposure to
family violence by the perpetrator, stressful events in the
family including recent moves, isolated families, 4 or more
children, nonempathetic parents, poor nonviolent resolution
strategies, corporal punishment in the family, parental substance
abuse, and parental depression. There are almost always identifiable
antecedents prior to the actual abusive act. When child sexual
abuse is alleged, strict adherence to protocol is required
in the event that criminal proceedings may result.
Both men and women can be victims of domestic violence. Women
are much more likely to be hit, however, and are more likely
to suffer an injury when hit. Risk factors include poverty,
alcohol and other drug abuse, psychiatric disorders in both
the perpetrator and the victim, the presence of firearms in
the household, and male-dominated households.
In elder abuse, the perpetrator is most often a spouse or
partner rather than another adult. Adults who do beat elders
tend to have chronic psychiatric disorders. Elder abuse is
associated with the male being the caregiver, especially if
the caregiving takes place over a prolonged period of time.
The demands placed on the caregiver may exceed the capacity
of the individual to provide these services. This situation
may then lead to feelings of frustration and anger, eventually
resulting in aggressive acting out. Psychiatric or organic
mental disorders in the victim or caregiver as well as changes
in residence are also associated with elder abuse.
Because of the complexity of cases of abuse, it is very important
that the clinician coordinate case management services and
collaboration between agencies. When one form of abusive relationship
exists in a family, there are often other coexisting forms
of violence or psychopathology that should not be overlooked.
Preventive measures should be geared toward breaking the cycle
of intergenerational transfer of abuse. Ways of attempting
to decrease violent behavior include diminishing reliance
on corporal punishment and withdrawal of guns and other weapons
from the home. Most of the fatalities incurred from family
abuse are secondary to firearms. Schools should also become
a place for teaching about ways of reducing violence in the
home.
Sexual Violence
Sandra L. Bloom, MD,[1] reported on the increasing
problem of sex-related violence. In 5 studies conducted between
1940 and 1978, one fifth to one third of women reported that
they were the victims of childhood sexual abuse. Eight percent
of adolescents aged 12 to 17 years reported that they were
victims of a serious sexual assault. Nearly 25% of female
college students reported that they had been raped. At least
32,000 pregnancies annually are reported to be the product
of a rape. One study found that 50% to 60% of college men
reported that they would rape a woman if they were able to
get away with it.
Many long-term consequences of sexual abuse exist, including
personality problems such as borderline personality disorder,
dissociative disorders, mood disorders, increased substance
abuse, and pain syndromes, among others. In women who are
sexually abused as children, there is a 28-fold greater likelihood
of being arrested as a prostitute. Although sexual violence
is often seen as a problem of women, men also suffer from
a significant amount of sexual abuse and the sequelae are
also significant. It is estimated that each episode of child
sexual abuse costs society $99,000 at minimum.
Prevention
Paul Jay Fink, MD,[1] suggested that the physician
become an advocate for community antiviolence initiatives
to expand the physician role beyond the traditional "case
by case" means of intervention. Prevention of violence
has generally focused on incarceration as the primary means
of dealing with this complex issue. There are 250,000 people
with mental illnesses in prison. The process of deinstitutionalization
has shifted many of the seriously mentally ill from state
psychiatric hospitals to jails. Most of these individuals
do not receive adequate treatment.
Although the media often portrays violence in the United
States as spinning out of control, in actuality, rates of
violence have been steadily decreasing over the past several
years. The primary means of decreasing violence should be
to reduce the number of guns. There are 250 million guns in
the United States, and this number is a major public health
issue. Secondary preventive measures should focus on decreasing
media violence. Repeated exposure to media violence leads
to increasing comfort with violence as a means of conflict
resolution. Corporal punishment should also be substantially
reduced. Almost all criminals sentenced to death have been
abused physically, sexually, and/or emotionally.
Treatment
Richard P. Kluft, MD,[1] reviewed the broad range
of treatment options and the difficulties in treating victims
of traumatic violence. Some individuals may get worse with
attempts to recover further details of a traumatic event.
Supportive therapy is advisable in these individuals. Visualization
and imagery interventions may be helpful. Dissociative symptoms
and disorders require specific treatments and therefore must
be accurately diagnosed. A stage-oriented model that has been
most recently advocated by Judith Herman[3
appears to be particularly suitable. The first stage is
safety, followed by remembrance, and finally reconnection.
The grieving process is often central to successful psychological
intervention.
Memory of the event is often the critical factor in analyzing
the impact of the event and determining a suitable course.
Memory is frequently fragmentary, however, and is experienced
only as sensory perceptions. Subsequent life experiences may
alter memory of the event. This makes accurate reporting of
the event difficult. The validity of recovered memories has
come under increasing scrutiny because of the possibility
of false accusations. In one study, the rate of documented
trauma was approximately 74% in both recovered as well as
always-remembered memories. It should not be assumed that
recovered memories never occurred or that always-remembered
memories actually took place.
There has been controversy regarding how early after the
event the psychotherapeutic process should begin. It is important,
however, to relieve the acute distress of the patient to cement
the therapeutic bond and allow the patient to function effectively.
Firm boundaries should be maintained in a supportive environment,
especially in light of the current medico-legal environment.
Cultural differences between the patient and client should
be understood as much as possible. This will minimize the
possibility of misdiagnosing conditions and will help in the
initiation of appropriate treatment.
Psychopharmacologic interventions often involve a number
of different types of agents that affect a variety of neurotransmitter
systems. Both the serotonergic as well as the noradrenergic
system have been implicated in the etiology of PTSD. Medications
tend to be much more effective at treating symptoms of hyperarousal,
mood, and sleep difficulties. They are considerably less effective
in treating symptoms of numbing and withdrawal.
Summary and Conclusion
Traumatic and violent experiences are very common and often
result in substantial negative consequences for the victim,
perpetrator, and society. The victim frequently suffers for
years after the acute event, and the psychological, physical,
and social sequelae may never be fully resolved. Accurate
diagnosis and subsequent vigorous treatment is required to
help resolve some of the symptoms in the individual and help
other individuals in the patient's social network. Preventive
public measures are required to deal with this serious public
health problem.
References
1.
Bell CC, Fink PJ, Berg AZ, et al. Psychiatric perspectives
on violence. Program and abstracts from the 153 rd Annual
American Psychiatric Association Meeting, May 13-18, 2000;
Chicago, Illinois. Forum 1.
2.
Bell CC, ed. American Psychiatric Association Task Force on
Violence. New Directions for Mental Health Services. Monograph
Number 86.
3.
Herman JL, Harvey MR. Adult memories of childhood trauma:
a naturalistic clinical study. J Trauma Stress. 1997;10:557-571.
|